From what I understand from the docs, the 64k limit applies to both the
number of items in a collection and the size of its elements?
Why is there a constraint on value size in collections, when other types
such as blob or text can be larger?
Thanks,
Sylvain
Le 01/01/2015 20:04, DuyHai Doan a écrit :
Storage-engine wise, they are almost equivalent, thought there are
some minor differences:
1) with Set structure, you cannot store more that 64kb worth of data
2) collections and maps are loaded entirely by Cassandra for each
query, whereas with clustering columns you can select a slice of columns
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com
<mailto:bur...@spinn3r.com>> wrote:
I think the two tables are the same. Correct?
create table foo (
source text,
target text,
primary key( source, target )
)
vs
create table foo (
source text,
target set<text>,
primary key( source )
)
… meaning that the first one, under the covers is represented the
same as the second. As a slice.
Am I correct?
--
Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com <http://Spinn3r.com>
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog:**http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
