AH!!! I had forgotten about both of those issues. Good points.. On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 11:04 AM, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Storage-engine wise, they are almost equivalent, thought there are some > minor differences: > > 1) with Set structure, you cannot store more that 64kb worth of data > 2) collections and maps are loaded entirely by Cassandra for each query, > whereas with clustering columns you can select a slice of columns > > > > On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > >> I think the two tables are the same. Correct? >> >> create table foo ( >> >> source text, >> target text, >> primary key( source, target ) >> ) >> >> >> vs >> >> create table foo ( >> >> source text, >> target set<text>, >> primary key( source ) >> ) >> >> … meaning that the first one, under the covers is represented the same as >> the second. As a slice. >> >> Am I correct? >> >> -- >> >> Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com >> Location: *San Francisco, CA* >> blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com >> … or check out my Google+ profile >> <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> >> <http://spinn3r.com> >> >> > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
