On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:38 AM, André Cruz <andre.c...@co.sapo.pt> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2014, at 19:07, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > > > > Yes. Do you know if 5748 was created as a result of compaction or via a > flush from a memtable? > > It was the result of a compaction: > Ok, so in theory if you had the input SSTables to that compaction, you could use them to diagnose this bug, by seeing what values they had for that row before compaction. This is why something like tablesnap can be useful in practice... =Rob
