On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM, André Cruz <andre.c...@co.sapo.pt> wrote:
> This data does not use TTLs. What other reason could there be for a mask? > If I connect using cassandra-cli to that specific node, which becomes the > coordinator, is it guaranteed to not ask another node when CL is ONE and it > contains that row? > Other than rare cases of writing "doomstones" (deletes with timestamps in the future) not sure in what case this might occur. But for any given value on any given node, you can verify the value it has in 100% of SStables... that's what both the normal read path and repair should do when reconciling row fragments into the materialized row? Hard to understand a case where repair fails, and I might provide that set of SStables attached to an Apache JIRA. =Rob
