More info: the RDBMS based db gets changed by writers in a vicinity of 40-50% 
of all data e.g. 100GB a week.
 The indexes can be defrugged, which is both expensive and time consuming. Many 
indexes become quickly out of date.

Not sure what you mean in retrospect to consistency against indexes.

I doubt there is room for bugs, this is a "by design" application behaviour.

 

Regards,

Arthur

 

---- Original Message ----
From: Hannu Kröger <hkro...@gmail.com>
To: user <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Sent: Sun, Sep 28, 2014 11:30 am
Subject: Re: Indexes Fragmentation



Hi,


I think more information is needed before this question can be answered. In 
many cases you manage the indexes by yourself. If that breaks, then you have a 
consistency problem or a bug in your own code. Consistency is tunable (trade 
off with performance and availability) and bugs can be fixed.  In any case, if 
you can shed a bit light on the use case, then it would be easier to answer 
your question.


Hannu


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Arthur Zubarev <arthur.zuba...@aol.com>
Date: 2014-09-28 17:55 GMT+03:00
Subject: Indexes Fragmentation
To: user@cassandra.apache.org



 Hi all:

A client on a RDBMS faces quick index fragmentations, statistics become 
inaccurate. Many within 4 hours (fast updates + writes, but mostly updates).

I am looking into replacing the RDBMS with Cassandra.

Will I face the same issue with indexes with Cassandra?

Thank you!

Regards,

Arthur



Reply via email to