Yes, what about CQL style columns? Please clarify
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:32 PM, tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes my question what about CQL-style columns. > > > 2014-07-04 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jens Rantil <jens.ran...@tink.se>: > > Just so you guys aren't misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were not >> refering to CQL-style columns, right? >> >> /J >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN < >> romain.hardo...@urssaf.fr> wrote: >> >>> Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series). >>> So 100 columns is OK. >>> >>> Best, >>> Romain >>> >>> >>> >>> tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com> a écrit sur 03/07/2014 21:55:18 : >>> >>> > De : tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com> >>> > A : user@cassandra.apache.org, >>> > Date : 03/07/2014 21:55 >>> > Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies >>> > >>> > thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one >>> > possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less >>> CFs. >>> >>> > With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100 >>> > columns; would that be a problem? >>> > >>> > Thank You, >>> > Tommaso >>> > >>> >> >> > -- Sourabh Agrawal Bangalore +91 9945657973
