Just so you guys aren't misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were not refering to CQL-style columns, right?
/J On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardo...@urssaf.fr> wrote: > Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series). > So 100 columns is OK. > > Best, > Romain > > > > tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com> a écrit sur 03/07/2014 21:55:18 : > > > De : tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com> > > A : user@cassandra.apache.org, > > Date : 03/07/2014 21:55 > > Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies > > > > thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one > > possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less CFs. > > > With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100 > > columns; would that be a problem? > > > > Thank You, > > Tommaso > > >
