2013/12/9 Nate McCall <n...@thelastpickle.com>: > Do you have any secondary indexes defined in the schema? That could lead to > a 'mega row' pretty easily depending on the cardinality of the value.
That's an interesting point - but no, we don't have any secondary indexes anywhere. From the heap dump, it's fairly evident that it's not a single huge row but actually many rows. I'll keep watching if this occurs again, or if the compaction fixed it for good. Thanks, Klaus
