On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Rob Coli <[email protected]> wrote: >> 150,000 sstables seem highly unlikely to be performant. As a simple >> example of why, on the read path the bloom filter for every sstable >> must be consulted... > > Unfortunately that's a bad example since that's not true.
You learn something new every day. Thanks for the clarification. I reduce my claim to "a huge number of SSTables are unlikely to be performant". :) =Rob -- =Robert Coli AIM>ALK - [email protected] YAHOO - rcoli.palominob SKYPE - rcoli_palominodb
