If you are on Ubuntu it may be this 
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#ubuntu_hangs

otherwise I would look for GC problems. 

Cheers


-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 13/03/2012, at 7:53 PM, Tamar Fraenkel wrote:

> Done it. Now it generally runs ok, till one of the nodes get's stuck with 
> 100% cpu and I need to reboot it.
> 
> Last lines in the system.log just before are:
>  INFO [OptionalTasks:1] 2012-03-13 07:36:43,850 MeteredFlusher.java (line 62) 
> flushing high-traffic column family CFS(Keyspace='tok', 
> ColumnFamily='tk_vertical_tag_story_indx') (estimated 35417890 bytes)
>  INFO [OptionalTasks:1] 2012-03-13 07:36:43,869 ColumnFamilyStore.java (line 
> 704) Enqueuing flush of 
> Memtable-tk_vertical_tag_story_indx@2002820169(1620316/35417890 
> serialized/live bytes, 30572 ops)
>  INFO [FlushWriter:76] 2012-03-13 07:36:43,869 Memtable.java (line 246) 
> Writing Memtable-tk_vertical_tag_story_indx@2002820169(1620316/35417890 
> serialized/live bytes, 30572 ops)
>  INFO [FlushWriter:76] 2012-03-13 07:36:44,015 Memtable.java (line 283) 
> Completed flushing 
> /opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-191-Data.db (2134123 
> bytes)
>  INFO [OptionalTasks:1] 2012-03-13 07:37:37,886 MeteredFlusher.java (line 62) 
> flushing high-traffic column family CFS(Keyspace='tok', 
> ColumnFamily='tk_vertical_tag_story_indx') (estimated 34389135 bytes)
>  INFO [OptionalTasks:1] 2012-03-13 07:37:37,887 ColumnFamilyStore.java (line 
> 704) Enqueuing flush of 
> Memtable-tk_vertical_tag_story_indx@1869953681(1573252/34389135 
> serialized/live bytes, 29684 ops)
>  INFO [FlushWriter:76] 2012-03-13 07:37:37,887 Memtable.java (line 246) 
> Writing Memtable-tk_vertical_tag_story_indx@1869953681(1573252/34389135 
> serialized/live bytes, 29684 ops)
>  INFO [FlushWrit
> 
> Any idea?
> I am considering adding a third node, so that replication factor of 2 won't 
> stuck my system when one node goes down. Does it make sense?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> Tamar Fraenkel 
> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
> 
> <tokLogo.png>
> 
> ta...@tok-media.com
> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:51 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> wrote:
> Reduce these settings for the CF
> row_cache (disable it)
> key_cache (disable it)
> 
> Increase these settings for the CF
> bloom_filter_fp_chance
> 
> Reduce these settings in cassandra.yaml
> 
> flush_largest_memtables_at
> memtable_flush_queue_size
> sliced_buffer_size_in_kb
> in_memory_compaction_limit_in_mb
> concurrent_compactors
> 
> 
> Increase these settings 
> index_interval
> 
> 
> While it obviously depends on load, I would not be surprised if you had a lot 
> of trouble running cassandra with that setup. 
> 
> Cheers
> A
> 
> 
> -----------------
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Developer
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
> 
> On 6/03/2012, at 11:02 PM, Tamar Fraenkel wrote:
> 
>> Arron, Thanks for your response. I was afraid this is the issue.
>> Can you give me some direction regarding the fine tuning of my VMs, I would 
>> like to explore that option some more.
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Tamar Fraenkel 
>> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
>> 
>> <tokLogo.png>
>> 
>> ta...@tok-media.com
>> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
>> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
>> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> 
>> wrote:
>> You do not have enough memory allocated to the JVM and are suffering from 
>> excessive GC as a result.
>> 
>> There are some tuning things you can try, but 480MB is not enough. 1GB would 
>> be a better start, 2 better than that. 
>> 
>> Consider using https://github.com/pcmanus/ccm for testing multiple instances 
>> on a single server rather than a VM.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> -----------------
>> Aaron Morton
>> Freelance Developer
>> @aaronmorton
>> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>> 
>> On 6/03/2012, at 10:21 PM, Tamar Fraenkel wrote:
>> 
>>> I have some more info, after couple of hours running the problematic node 
>>> became again 100% CPU and I had to reboot it, last lines from log show it 
>>> did GC:
>>> 
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:28:00,880 GCInspector.java (line 
>>> 122) GC for Copy: 203 ms for 1 collections, 185983456 used; max is 513802240
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:28:50,595 GCInspector.java (line 
>>> 122) GC for Copy: 3927 ms for 1 collections, 156572576 used; max is 
>>> 513802240
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:28:55,434 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 50) Pool Name                    Active   Pending   Blocked
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,298 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) ReadStage                         2         2         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,499 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) RequestResponseStage              0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,500 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) ReadRepairStage                   0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,500 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) MutationStage                     0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,500 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) ReplicateOnWriteStage             0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,500 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) GossipStage                       0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,501 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) AntiEntropyStage                  0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,501 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) MigrationStage                    0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,501 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) StreamStage                       0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,501 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) MemtablePostFlusher               0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,502 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) FlushWriter                       0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,502 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) MiscStage                         0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,502 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) InternalResponseStage             0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,502 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 65) HintedHandoff                     0         0         0
>>>  INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-03-06 10:29:03,553 StatusLogger.java (line 
>>> 69) CompactionManager               n/a         0
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Tamar Fraenkel 
>>> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
>>> 
>>> <tokLogo.png>
>>> 
>>> ta...@tok-media.com
>>> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
>>> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
>>> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Tamar Fraenkel <ta...@tok-media.com> wrote:
>>> Works..
>>> 
>>> But during the night my setup encountered a problem.
>>> I have two VMs on my cluster (running on VmWare ESXi).
>>> Each VM has1GB memory, and two Virtual Disks of 16 GB
>>> They are running on a small server with 4CPUs (2.66 GHz), and 4 GB memory 
>>> (together with two other VMs)
>>> I put cassandra data on the second disk of each machine.
>>> VMs are running Ubuntu 11.10 and cassandra 1.0.7.
>>> 
>>> I left them running overnight and this morning when I came:
>>> In one node cassandra was down, and the last thing in the system.log is:
>>> 
>>>  INFO [CompactionExecutor:150] 2012-03-06 00:55:04,821 CompactionTask.java 
>>> (line 113) Compacting 
>>> [SSTableReader(path='/opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1243-Data.db'),
>>>  
>>> SSTableReader(path='/opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1245-Data.db'),
>>>  
>>> SSTableReader(path='/opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1242-Data.db'),
>>>  
>>> SSTableReader(path='/opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1244-Data.db')]
>>>  INFO [CompactionExecutor:150] 2012-03-06 00:55:07,919 CompactionTask.java 
>>> (line 221) Compacted to 
>>> [/opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1246-Data.db,].  
>>> 32,424,771 to 26,447,685 (~81% of original) bytes for 58,938 keys at 
>>> 8.144165MB/s.  Time: 3,097ms.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The other node was using all it's CPU and I had to restart it.
>>> After that, I can see that the last lines in it's system.log are that the 
>>> other node is down...
>>> 
>>>  INFO [FlushWriter:142] 2012-03-06 00:55:02,418 Memtable.java (line 246) 
>>> Writing Memtable-tk_vertical_tag_story_indx@1365852701(1122169/25154556 
>>> serialized/live bytes, 21173 ops)
>>>  INFO [FlushWriter:142] 2012-03-06 00:55:02,742 Memtable.java (line 283) 
>>> Completed flushing 
>>> /opt/cassandra/data/tok/tk_vertical_tag_story_indx-hc-1244-Data.db (2075930 
>>> bytes)
>>>  INFO [GossipTasks:1] 2012-03-06 08:02:18,584 Gossiper.java (line 818) 
>>> InetAddress /10.0.0.31 is now dead.
>>> 
>>> How can I trace why that happened?
>>> Also, I brought cassandra up in both nodes. They both spend long time 
>>> reading commit logs, but now they seem to run.
>>> Any idea how to debug or improve my setup?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tamar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tamar Fraenkel 
>>> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
>>> 
>>> <tokLogo.png>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ta...@tok-media.com
>>> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
>>> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
>>> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:30 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Create nodes that do not share seeds, and give the clusters different names 
>>> as a safety measure. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> -----------------
>>> Aaron Morton
>>> Freelance Developer
>>> @aaronmorton
>>> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>>> 
>>> On 6/03/2012, at 12:04 AM, Tamar Fraenkel wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I want tow separate clusters.
>>>> Tamar Fraenkel 
>>>> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
>>>> 
>>>> <tokLogo.png>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ta...@tok-media.com
>>>> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
>>>> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
>>>> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Do you want to create two separate clusters or a single cluster with two 
>>>> data centres ? 
>>>> 
>>>> If it's the later, token selection is discussed here 
>>>> http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.0/install/cluster_init#token-gen-cassandra
>>>>  
>>>>> Moreover all tokens must be unique (even across datacenters), although - 
>>>>> from pure curiosity - I wonder what is the rationale behind this.
>>>> Otherwise data is not evenly distributed.
>>>> 
>>>>> By the way, can someone enlighten me about the first line in the output 
>>>>> of the nodetool. Obviously it contains a token, but nothing else. It 
>>>>> seems like a formatting glitch, but maybe it has a role. 
>>>> It's the exclusive lower bound token for the first node in the ring. This 
>>>> also happens to be the token for the last node in the ring. 
>>>> 
>>>> In your setup 
>>>> 10.0.0.19 "owns" (85070591730234615865843651857942052864+1) to 0
>>>> 10.0.0.28 "owns"  (0 + 1) to 85070591730234615865843651857942052864
>>>> 
>>>> (does not imply primary replica, just used to map keys to nodes.)
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----------------
>>>> Aaron Morton
>>>> Freelance Developer
>>>> @aaronmorton
>>>> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/03/2012, at 11:38 PM, Hontvári József Levente wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> You have to use PropertyFileSnitch and NetworkTopologyStrategy to create 
>>>>> a multi-datacenter setup with two circles. You can start reading from 
>>>>> this page:
>>>>> http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.0/cluster_architecture/replication#about-replica-placement-strategy
>>>>> 
>>>>> Moreover all tokens must be unique (even across datacenters), although - 
>>>>> from pure curiosity - I wonder what is the rationale behind this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> By the way, can someone enlighten me about the first line in the output 
>>>>> of the nodetool. Obviously it contains a token, but nothing else. It 
>>>>> seems like a formatting glitch, but maybe it has a role. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2012.03.05. 11:06, Tamar Fraenkel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>> I have a Cassandra  cluster with two nodes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> nodetool ring -h localhost
>>>>>> Address         DC          Rack        Status State   Load            
>>>>>> Owns    Token
>>>>>>                                                                          
>>>>>>       85070591730234615865843651857942052864
>>>>>> 10.0.0.19       datacenter1 rack1       Up     Normal  488.74 KB       
>>>>>> 50.00%  0
>>>>>> 10.0.0.28       datacenter1 rack1       Up     Normal  504.63 KB       
>>>>>> 50.00%  85070591730234615865843651857942052864
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I want to create a second ring with the same name but two different 
>>>>>> nodes.
>>>>>> using tokengentool I get the same tokens as they are affected from the 
>>>>>> number of nodes in a ring.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My question is like this:
>>>>>> Lets say I create two new VMs, with IPs: 10.0.0.31 and 10.0.0.11
>>>>>> In 10.0.0.31 cassandra.yaml I will set
>>>>>> initial_token: 0
>>>>>> seeds: "10.0.0.31"
>>>>>> listen_address: 10.0.0.31
>>>>>> rpc_address: 0.0.0.0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In 10.0.0.11 cassandra.yaml I will set
>>>>>> initial_token: 85070591730234615865843651857942052864
>>>>>> seeds: "10.0.0.31"
>>>>>> listen_address: 10.0.0.11
>>>>>> rpc_address: 0.0.0.0 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would the rings be separate?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tamar Fraenkel 
>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer, TOK Media 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <Mail Attachment.png>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ta...@tok-media.com
>>>>>> Tel:   +972 2 6409736 
>>>>>> Mob:  +972 54 8356490 
>>>>>> Fax:   +972 2 5612956 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to