unless you use distributed fs On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Maxim Potekhin <potek...@bnl.gov> wrote:
> The idea was to provide redundancy, resilience, automatic load balancing > and automatic repairs. Going the way of the file system does not achieve > any of that. > > Maxim > > > > On 2/22/2012 1:34 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > > Outside on the file system and a pointer to it in C* > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Rafael Almeida <almeida...@yahoo.com>wrote: > >> Keep them where? >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com> >> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org >> *Cc:* potek...@bnl.gov >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:44 PM >> *Subject:* Re: Please advise -- 750MB object possible? >> >> In my opinion if you are busy site or application keep blobs out of the >> database. >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Dan Retzlaff <dretzl...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Chunking is a good idea, but you'll have to do it yourself. A few of the >> columns in our application got quite large (maybe ~150MB) and the failure >> mode was RPC timeout exceptions. Nodes couldn't always move that much data >> across our data center interconnect in the default 10 seconds. With enough >> heap and a faster network you could probably get by without chunking, but >> it's not ideal. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Maxim Potekhin <potek...@bnl.gov> wrote: >> >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm being asked whether we can serve an "object", which I assume is a >> blob, of 750MB size? >> I guess the real question is of how to chunk it and/or even it's possible >> to chunk it. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Maxim >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
