The idea was to provide redundancy, resilience, automatic load balancing
and automatic repairs. Going the way of the file system does not achieve
any of that.
Maxim
On 2/22/2012 1:34 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Outside on the file system and a pointer to it in C*
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Rafael Almeida <almeida...@yahoo.com
<mailto:almeida...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Keep them where?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
<mailto:mohitanch...@gmail.com>>
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
*Cc:* potek...@bnl.gov <mailto:potek...@bnl.gov>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:44 PM
*Subject:* Re: Please advise -- 750MB object possible?
In my opinion if you are busy site or application keep blobs
out of the database.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Dan Retzlaff
<dretzl...@gmail.com <mailto:dretzl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Chunking is a good idea, but you'll have to do it
yourself. A few of the columns in our application got
quite large (maybe ~150MB) and the failure mode was RPC
timeout exceptions. Nodes couldn't always move that much
data across our data center interconnect in the default 10
seconds. With enough heap and a faster network you could
probably get by without chunking, but it's not ideal.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Maxim Potekhin
<potek...@bnl.gov <mailto:potek...@bnl.gov>> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm being asked whether we can serve an "object",
which I assume is a blob, of 750MB size?
I guess the real question is of how to chunk it and/or
even it's possible to chunk it.
Thanks!
Maxim
