[Changed subject to leave survey behind] Cool, thx. Holding my breath for "row groups" :O
I see it is targeted for 1.1, is this realistic? From: Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com<mailto:jak...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:06:23 -0800 To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Second Cassandra users survey Solandra does this https://github.com/tjake/Solandra/blob/solandra/src/lucandra/dht/RandomPartitioner.java But Row Groups is going to be the "official" way. -Jake On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Todd Burruss <bburr...@expedia.com<mailto:bburr...@expedia.com>> wrote: Thx jake for the JIRA, but there was someone at the conference that had already implemented what I mentioned. It didn't offer any atomicity, just co-locating a family of data on the same node. From: Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com<mailto:jak...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:53:20 -0800 To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Second Cassandra users survey Hi Todd, Entity Groups : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684 -Jake
