because it's not worth the penalty to concurrency On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Alvin UW <alvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why the secondary index is not updated absolutely atomically? > > 2010/9/2 Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> >> >> yes, it is updated atomically (but not in isolation, it's possible for >> a client to see changes to one but not the other temporarily) >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Alvin Jin <alvi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I was thinking the details of the secondary index in 0.7. >> > Will it be updated atomically with its base table? >> > >> > Any explaination the on secondary index is appreciated. >> > Thanks. >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Is-the-secondary-index-maintained-synchronously-in-0-7-tp5492798p5492798.html >> > Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive >> > at Nabble.com. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Ellis >> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra >> co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support >> http://riptano.com > >
-- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com
