Thanks. But why does this situation happen? I mean "but not in isolation". Can we avoid it?
2010/9/2 Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> > yes, it is updated atomically (but not in isolation, it's possible for > a client to see changes to one but not the other temporarily) > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Alvin Jin <alvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I was thinking the details of the secondary index in 0.7. > > Will it be updated atomically with its base table? > > > > Any explaination the on secondary index is appreciated. > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Is-the-secondary-index-maintained-synchronously-in-0-7-tp5492798p5492798.html > > Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Ellis > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support > http://riptano.com >
