On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Peter Schuller <peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote: >> Remember the returned results are NOT sorted, so you whenever you are >> dropping the first by default, you might be dropping a good one. At >> least that would be my guess here. > > Sorry I may be forgetting something about this thread, but AFAIK the > results from cassandra (the thrift API) are sorted. Maybe there was a > client in between that did not preserve the sorting (I forget which > thread that was).
Column slices are always sorted yes, we were talking about get_RANGE_slices and the range of rows is not sorted (for RPP). re incrementing/decrementing: you're right, I was only using my inc/dec for UUID which are fixed length. /thomas
