On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Paul Prescod <pres...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you mean by "bad practice"? The document above implies that it > is nearly impossible. It implies that you will have between 1 and 4 > SSTables. Does the administrator have a choice in this matter? >
Hey, I am arguing the proposed 'worst case' is totally absurd, don't ask me to make it absurd _and_ logical! > I am probably being totally naive, but is the answer to the question > "worst iops on read" just: > > 3 reads per SSTable * 4 SStables * ReplicationFactor ? > > = 3 * 4 * 3 = 36? > Why does RF enter this? b
