I could be wrong, but I would say that even if the thrift syntax gave you a 'get/set' you want, you would still have the 'inconsistency' risk primarily because of the Eventually Consistency ( http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2008/12/eventually_consistent.html) as implementation in Cassandra. (No concept of a database lock, transaction, mutex, etc... right?) (Someone please correct me if I'm wrong about this)
2010/3/17 Juan Manuel García del Moral <juanman...@taringa.net> > So I would have to retrieve (client.get()) the value, then increment it > and update it (client.set()) again? with the inconsistency risk this two > operations imply... > > annoying > > thanks for your help > > > > > 2010/3/17 Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com> > > afaik, nope >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> 2010/3/17 Juan Manuel García del Moral <juanman...@taringa.net>: >> > Hello >> > >> > I would like to know if there is any method available to update >> > (increment/decrement) INTEGER values in Columns/SuperColumns, and how I >> can >> > use this method thru the C++ API >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Juan >> > >> > >> > > -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert "Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe
