Right, I know that jdk 1.4.2 works. I suspect that some other jdk version is creeping into the class/jar file. I specified JAVA_HOME for the 1.4.2 jdk. I also suggested to the developer to change the path. (I heard that that did not work) java -version also states that 1.4.2 will be used.
Is there some option/parm on the javac that will help with this? Perhaps <target="1.4"> ? Perhaps <compiler="modern"> ? --glenn On 12/11/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well there is your problem...the JVM you are trying to use to run (not compile) does not support the version that was compiled. Meaning...let's say you compiled using the JDK 1.5 but attempted to run using the JDK 1.2.2 - you'd get the error listed. Somehow you are compiling with a newer JDK but when running, you are getting some older version of the JDK. Make sure your path is correct and include this newer JDK... You might want to put $JAVA_HOME/bin first in your path. Or, on the command line type: java -version Either way its a JVM mismatch problem. glenn opdycke-hansen wrote: > Replies below. > > On 12/11/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What type of exceptions are you getting? > > java.lang.Exception: Error in > [ProcessDefinitions/Shared/Logging/MaskLogData.process/MaskPayload] > BW-JAVA-100030 Unable to obtain information for method > [maskElementsInPayload] from the class > [com.usbank.entdevsvc.mask.MaskPayload]. Exception occurred. > java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > com/usbank/entdevsvc/mask/MaskPayload (Unsupported major.minor version > 49.0) > >> >> If you use the class file outside the jar file...does that work? > > We have not tried that (yet). > >> >> Is your harddrive full? > > no > >> >> glenn opdycke-hansen wrote: >> > We are seeing that the javac can produce an unusable .class file. >> > One PC will build the java source OK, but the other PC does not. The >> > resulting JAR file has a different size and there are exceptions when >> > the other jar is used. >> > We set JAVA_HOME to the jdk (1.4.2_13) on both PCs. >> > >> > Has anyone seen this? >> > Could it be due to differences in the PATH (winxp)? >> > Is there any way to check the version of the jdk/javac used? (-verbose >> > does not seem to provide enough info) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --glenn >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Scot P. Floess >> 27 Lake Royale >> Louisburg, NC 27549 >> >> 252-478-8087 (Home) >> 919-754-4592 (Work) >> >> Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate >> Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- Scot P. Floess 27 Lake Royale Louisburg, NC 27549 252-478-8087 (Home) 919-754-4592 (Work) Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
