I'd try removing all my class files and recompiling first. Just because you removed the JDK 1.5 - does that mean you rebuilt everything afterward? Otherwise you will still have 1.5 compiled versions of your class files.

glenn opdycke-hansen wrote:
ok, how could we be getting jdk 1.5 java compile?
We removed (via control panel) the 1.5 jdk. could some file be lurking
in c:\winxp or other folder?

Below are parts of the log from the build:

PATH=D:\Software\Java\j2sdk1.4.2_13\bin;D:\Software\Perl\bin\;C:\CYGWIN\bin;D:\CVSNT;D:\Perl\bin;D:\apache-ant-1.6.5\bin;C:\PROGRA~1\Oracle\jre\1.1.8\bin;C:\WINXP\system32;C:\WINXP\System32\
...
ANT_HOME=D:\apache-ant-1.6.5
JAVA_HOME=D:\Software\Java\j2sdk1.4.2_13
Apache Ant version 1.6.5 compiled on June 2 2005
Buildfile: build.xml
Adding reference: ant.PropertyHelper
Detected Java version: 1.4 in: D:\Software\Java\j2sdk1.4.2_13\jre
Detected OS: Windows XP
...
   [javac] com\usbank\entdevsvc\mask\MaskPayload.java added as
com/usbank/entdevsvc/mask/MaskPayload.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] Compiling 1 source file to
K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\classes
   [javac] Using modern compiler
fileset: Setup scanner in dir
K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\vendor\jar with patternSet{
includes: [*.jar] excludes: [] }
dropping K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\C:\PROGRA~1\IBM\SQLLIB\ja
from path as it doesn't exist
   [javac] Compilation arguments:
   [javac] '-d'
[javac] 'K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\classes'
   [javac] '-classpath'
[javac] 'K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\classes;K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\vendor\jar\ContivoRuntime.jar;K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_c
...
   [javac] '-sourcepath'
[javac] 'K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\source'
   [javac] '-target'
   [javac] '1.4'
   [javac] '-g'
   [javac] '-verbose'
   [javac]
   [javac] The ' characters around the executable and arguments are
   [javac] not part of the command.
   [javac] File to be compiled:
   [javac]
K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\source\com\usbank\entdevsvc\mask\MaskPayload.java
   [javac] [parsing started
K:\bxnaray_ssmcmn_1.0_dev\ssm_src\ssm_cmn\ems_maskpayload\source\com\usbank\entdevsvc\mask\MaskPayload.java]
   [javac] [parsing completed 63ms]
   [javac] [loading
D:\Software\Java\j2sdk1.4.2_13\jre\lib\rt.jar(java/io/IOException.class)]
   [javac] [loading
D:\Software\Java\j2sdk1.4.2_13\jre\lib\rt.jar(java/io/Serializable.class)]
...

I did notice an invalid entry in the PATH.
Should I check the CLASSPATH too?



On 12/11/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can certainly specify which JDK to use in the <javac> task.
However, that may not fix your runtime issue...if an older version of
the JDK is used to run against it...

Yes, specifying <target> may help...

Again, you need to ensure the VM being used when running against the
compiled class is the correct version (in your case I think that means a
1.4.2+ VM)...

It looks to me like your code is being compiled using the JDK 1.5.0+  I
just compiled some code and did a "javap -c -verbose" on a class
file...  With the JDK 1.5.0_09 I get a minor = 0
major = 49...  Compiling wiht "javac -source 1.2 release 1.2" I see the
minor = 0 major = 46.

My guess is the JDK being used during compilation is 1.5.0+.  As such,
try doing the target = "1.4" ... You may also need to set source = "1.4"

HTH,

Scot

glenn opdycke-hansen wrote:
> Right, I know that jdk 1.4.2 works.
> I suspect that some other jdk version is creeping into the class/jar
> file.
> I specified JAVA_HOME for the 1.4.2 jdk. I also suggested to the
> developer to change the path.  (I heard that that did not work)
> java -version also states that 1.4.2 will be used.
>
> Is there some option/parm on the javac that will help with this?
> Perhaps <target="1.4"> ?
> Perhaps <compiler="modern"> ?
> --glenn
>
> On 12/11/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well there is your problem...the JVM you are trying to use to run (not
>> compile) does not support the version that was compiled.
>> Meaning...let's say you compiled using the JDK 1.5 but attempted to run
>> using the JDK 1.2.2 - you'd get the error listed.
>>
>> Somehow you are compiling with a newer JDK but when running, you are
>> getting some older version of the JDK.
>>
>> Make sure your path is correct and include this newer JDK... You might >> want to put $JAVA_HOME/bin first in your path. Or, on the command line
>> type:
>>
>> java -version
>>
>> Either way its a JVM mismatch problem.
>>
>> glenn opdycke-hansen wrote:
>> > Replies below.
>> >
>> > On 12/11/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> What type of exceptions are you getting?
>> >
>> > java.lang.Exception: Error in
>> > [ProcessDefinitions/Shared/Logging/MaskLogData.process/MaskPayload]
>> > BW-JAVA-100030 Unable to obtain information for method
>> > [maskElementsInPayload] from the class
>> > [com.usbank.entdevsvc.mask.MaskPayload].  Exception occurred.
>> > java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
>> > com/usbank/entdevsvc/mask/MaskPayload (Unsupported major.minor version
>> > 49.0)
>> >
>> >>
>> >> If you use the class file outside the jar file...does that work?
>> >
>> > We have not tried that (yet).
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Is your harddrive full?
>> >
>> > no
>> >
>> >>
>> >> glenn opdycke-hansen wrote:
>> >> > We are seeing that the javac can produce an unusable .class file.
>> >> > One PC will build the java source OK, but the other PC does
>> not.  The
>> >> > resulting JAR file has a different size and there are exceptions
>> when
>> >> > the other jar is used.
>> >> > We set JAVA_HOME to the jdk (1.4.2_13) on both PCs.
>> >> >
>> >> > Has anyone seen this?
>> >> > Could it be due to differences in the PATH (winxp)?
>> >> > Is there any way to check the version of the jdk/javac used?
>> (-verbose
>> >> > does not seem to provide enough info)
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > --glenn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Scot P. Floess
>> >> 27 Lake Royale
>> >> Louisburg, NC  27549
>> >>
>> >> 252-478-8087 (Home)
>> >> 919-754-4592 (Work)
>> >>
>> >> Chief Architect JPlate  http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
>> >> Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Scot P. Floess
>> 27 Lake Royale
>> Louisburg, NC  27549
>>
>> 252-478-8087 (Home)
>> 919-754-4592 (Work)
>>
>> Chief Architect JPlate  http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
>> Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim
>>
>>
>

--
Scot P. Floess
27 Lake Royale
Louisburg, NC  27549

252-478-8087 (Home)
919-754-4592 (Work)

Chief Architect JPlate  http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim




--
Scot P. Floess
27 Lake Royale
Louisburg, NC  27549

252-478-8087 (Home)
919-754-4592 (Work)

Chief Architect JPlate  http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to