this discussion has been very useful on many fronts. I'm going to have fewer nightmares about security.
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > It looks like the encrypt command is already using this method if the > "with salt" arguement is provided? At least the encrypted result starts > with "salted" and at least part of the salt value. > > Bob S > > > > On Mar 1, 2017, at 07:37 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Peter. Very informative thank you. In the example, > > > > [protected form] = [salt] + protect([protection func], [salt] + > [credential]); > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- *Tom Glod* CEO @ *MakeShyft R.D.A* - www.makeshyft.com Developer of *U.M.P* - www.IamUMP.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
