It looks like the encrypt command is already using this method if the "with salt" arguement is provided? At least the encrypted result starts with "salted" and at least part of the salt value.
Bob S > On Mar 1, 2017, at 07:37 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Hi Peter. Very informative thank you. In the example, > > [protected form] = [salt] + protect([protection func], [salt] + [credential]); _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
