I mean if you do web scraping and use LC to analyze the results, a million is a small number.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM, hh <h...@hyperhh.de> wrote: > I think he means > > 10% of 1/100 of 1,000,000 iterations of a nano-million-dollar are 1 dollar. > > > Richard Gaskin wrote: > > ? > >> Mike Kerner wrote: > >> > says the guy who doesn't scrape. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> > > >> >> hh wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > I wasn't aware of that, good to know, "is in"/"contains" is 10% > >> >> > faster than "offset() > 0". > >> >> > >> >> But as with many benchmarks, it's helpful to keep the absolute times > in > >> >> mind. > >> >> > >> >> In my quickie test script I had to use 1,000,000 iterations just to > get > >> >> any appreciable duration to test. > >> >> > >> >> 10% of a fraction is a nanosecond isn't much to lose sleep over. :) > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And God said, "This is good." _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
