hh wrote:

> I wasn't aware of that, good to know, "is in"/"contains" is 10%
> faster than "offset() > 0".

But as with many benchmarks, it's helpful to keep the absolute times in mind.

In my quickie test script I had to use 1,000,000 iterations just to get any appreciable duration to test.

10% of a fraction is a nanosecond isn't much to lose sleep over. :)

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 ____________________________________________________________________
 ambassa...@fourthworld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to