ditto what Scott said. I've processed vocal audio every week for the last 15
years…
We have had this m4a vs mp3 discussion in house for years… the m4a man
typically is an audiophile that uses settings that are entirely unnecessary for
average listener (we do a lot of voice)… sure, if it were orchestral music… but
it's not. I go ahead and produce an MP3 file of the same file with a *smaller*
file size than the m4a file(s) and no one can tell the difference.
BR
On 8/13/16, 12:11 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of J. Landman Gay"
<use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of jac...@hyperactivesw.com>
wrote:
I'm sure you're right. I'll tell him, but he's got the final say.
On 8/13/2016 4:59 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
>There's another factor to your advantage here, if the majority of your
content is voice. Voice is WAY more forgiving of high compression than music,
so I would say you're good choosing a different format rather than jumping
through hoops trying to accommodate m4a. Save yourself some headache.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
