(Try again, apologies for accidentally sending) ... typo When you said " 2^AJ=A(J+1)"
I wonder if you meant "2^AJ >= A(J+1)" To many that may seem like nit-picking, but it is a NIT. However, if you MEANT what you wrote, then it is a YUGE NIT. It would mean that someone (Halmos?) found an extension of ZFC that trumps (sorry) Cohen's independence of CH. Is that the case? > On May 22, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Mick Collins <mickc...@mac.com> wrote: > > Doc Hawk, > I'm envious that you took a course from Halmos, but I question what is > probably a typo. > > "Dr. Hawkins" <doch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, which infinity? aleph-naught (A0) is the count of the > integers/wholes/natural > > A1=2^A0, the count of the reals. > > For that mater 2^AJ=A(J+1) > > A1-A0=A1 > > Aj^n=Aj > > A0 is also "countable"; A1 and higher are not. > > > Yes, I really took a course on that, from the master himself (Halmos) > > -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
