> On 23 Oct 2015, at 8:36 am, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote: > > My question wasn't about ROI, but where I was going with that is less > interesting than your reply, which raises a question of its own: > > Given that PHP, Python, Lua, Ruby, and most other scripting languages deliver > a great engine with no IDE at all, why don't we leverage the community's and > the team's interest in using external editors and just either bundle one with > LC and/or let people use their own?
Would moving the script editor to a separate process solve any problems we know about? Why not just continue with a built in editor and some IDE APIs that we can use to implement external editor plugins? _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
