Hi Pete,
Peter Haworth wrote > That's very interesting. I've never used private since I had the > impression that the only thing it did was stop the handler from being > called outside of the script it appears in. > > But it seems there is a performance benefit too. Why would that be, I > wonder. I understand that the engine only needs to look in the current > script for a private handler, but isn't that where the search for a > handler > starts anyway? from the dictionary: > Using private handlers when appropriate will also result in a performance > gain as less messages are passed through the message path. Kind regards Bernd -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Reverse-a-list-tp4688611p4688930.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
