I was under the impression that the Open Language initiative is to follow the usual open source model, and have some kind of gatekeeper who includes new, useful, user-contributed additions to the latest release. I could be wrong about that, though. - Charles
On 18 Aug 2014, at 12:58 PM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16/08/14 22:13, Richmond wrote: >> AND . . . >> >> Open Language. >> >> This seems very awkward. >> >> Let us just suppose Fred Flintstone writes an extension to the Livecode >> language (what is it called again?) >> that is very clever . . . >> >> 1. Does he, somehow, infect all subsequent versions of Livecode with his >> extension? >> >> 2. Does he make his extension extension available as a sort of patch that >> other Livecode users can >> choose to apply or not? >> >> 3. How does this get into the Dictionary? >> >> 4. Does it remain a sort of "in" secret between Fred and his chosen sub-cult? >> >> Barney Rubble. > > What chance an answer to this? > > Richmond. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
