On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:54 AM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote:
> Jerry Daniels <http://danielsmara.com/about-jerry/> did that a few years > ago with a couple of editors he invented, like the concept editor and > T-Rev/Remo. It worked brilliantly and was much simpler and more reliable > than his previous, more ambitious editor. He'd probably talk to you about > how he did it… he called it 'using agents' and explained it quite well. > > It was great because even if Livecode crashed, the scripts would still be > there in the editor. > > I would be quite happy with an IDE that was standaloe… I don't hack the > IDE. > Encouraged by that, I just setup up a simple client server mechanism in Livecode. The server is a standalone and the client is a stack I run in the IDE. It was very easy to send messages both directions. However, I notice that both the server and the IDE use a very high percentage of CPU time when they are running, even when there are no messages going back and forth. Both of them use read from socket with a callback message. Is that normal? Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> Home of lcStackBrowser <http://www.lcsql.com/lcstackbrowser.html> and SQLiteAdmin <http://www.lcsql.com/sqliteadmin.html> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
