Thanks for replying. Not quite sure what the issue is with the open source version. Is it not OK to have closed source add-ons to an open source package? For instance, for firefox or open office?
I can see that if it was an add-on which was packaged into a compiled software package, this would be problematic, because if asked one would have to release the source code, and would not be able to. However, the fact that one has used a proprietary tool in writing an open source package? There are some closed source Python IDEs, and that does not seem to be a problem. DrPython I think is one. Its only the source code of the application that must be available, not the source code of what editor for instance is used to write that code. Or am I missing something? Anyway, thanks, I'll download the trial version and have a go! Peter -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-lcStackbrowser-V2-Released-tp4674585p4674631.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
