Interesting that the naive solution (1) isn't a dog anymore, although (6) is still best.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Alex Tweedly <a...@tweedly.net> wrote: > For versions 1 and 6 (I didn't bother initially with the intermediate > ones). > > Here's the full result: > (all on Macbook Pro, OSX 10.8.4, and the built-in Python version 2.7.5) > (code, except for putting in a loop to do them all, as sent in the earlier > email) > > method 1 > time 0.025813 taking 3874016.96819 > > > method 2 > time 3.024751 taking 33060.5725893 > > > method 3 > time 0.053624 taking 1864836.64031 > > > method 4 > time 0.032143 taking 3111097.28401 > > > method 5 > time 0.069747 taking 1433753.42309 > > > method 6 > time 0.019208 taking 5206164.09829 > > Clearly the relative speeds are very different from what they were back at > Python 2.2 > > -- Alex. > > > On 08/09/2013 18:00, Geoff Canyon wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Tweedly <a...@tweedly.net> wrote: >> >> For which of his 6 versions of the code? >> ______________________________**_________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode> >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode> > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
