On 09/04/2013, at 5:12 PM, Georges Malamoud wrote: > Regarding the App Store, would it be useful if Runrev makes a public > statement to Apple stating that all stacks created with the community edition > of LC are covered by the GPLv2 license (or something else) and that as the > owner of the rights of the former proprietary edition of LC, they are > allowing these apps to be published and will not fight against them ?
I think RunRev might want to be careful here. For starters they may want the support of various open source bodies at some point that may find such a statement to Apple to undermine their stance. They also may need to consider that many potential contributors may come from the (quite anti Apple) Linux world and their use of a dual-license will already have the purists folks off side. Obviously it's RunRev's decision to make but I know I would want to tread carefully. -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application development for vertical markets mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
