Absolute freedom and absolute security are mutually exclusive. At least in the present state of the world as we know it. The trick is balance. You think balance lies further towards the freedom side of things. I, being an IT guy who has seen people hand their lives over to villains because they thought, "I don't have anything they want. What do I need a firewall and malware protection for?" Think its more towards the side of security. It all comes down to how bad you perceive the world to be. I happen to think the world, in places, is a very, very bad place. The Internet puts those far away bad places at your doorstep, nay, in you living room and in you pocket. And please don't call me lazy. I learned not to be lazy about security after our entire infrastructure was brought to its knees by the slammer worm.
Bob Sneidar IT Manager Calvary Chapel CM Sent from iPhone On Jan 20, 2013, at 13:54, "David C." <davidoco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, for the sake of a lazy person's method of securing digital safety, > it's just completely okay that you're willing to give up all semblance > of freedom from corporate tyranny and what if for sure an overbearing > abuse of power? _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
