Helps if I proofread before posting.. --> "As far as responsive design goes, perhaps a custom layouts per card size approach a proper way to go." --> "The square card size should also handle most cases where you want the width of a control to change but not the height."
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Chipp Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > Good points. > > Years ago I created altLayouLib and have used it for work in multiple OS > environments. With it you could set the controls layout behavior based upon > OS. It read the OS and resized/moved controls based upon MacOS, Win32 or > Other. > > As far as responsive design goes, it perhaps this approach a proper way to > go. So, for instance one could set different stack resolutions and layout > the controls for each based upon a specific resolution-- and if no > resolution matched, then it defaults to the closest resolution smaller than > the one being used. > > Still, seems like a lot of work. I still want to try Tom's approach of > different square cards(or stacks) for both portrait and landscape. I really > see potential in it and I think it *should* work fine with this latest > altMobileResizer library. The square sizing should also handle most cases > where you want the width of a control to change but not the height. > > BTW, just updated it to fix a niggling bug and added a button to it to > check for all images which don't have resizeQuality set to "Good". Just > press the update button to get the latest version. You should reinstall the > library and the OpenStack handlers on any existing projects. > -- Chipp Walters CEO, Altuit, Inc. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
