> If Apple had no included anything for free, (not sure how to > measure that) would they have charged less? Hmmm... no way to > test it, so it must remain a mystery.
The point of a bundle is to justify the price you want your target customer to pay - in Apple's case, they wanted you to pay premium prices (at the time). Consider why Apple never themselves didn't offer a barebones system. It was never in their corporate chemistry (certainly never in SJ's) to pursue that kind of strategy. When he killed off the clone market (which had players who did that), he could have simply had really basic cheap systems made inside Apple - but that's contrary to the premium product market strategy, and more like the white box or "value" market that Dell used to pursue. Within each product line (Macs, iPod, iPhone, iPad) you have very clear and very simple differentiated levels - the low end is cheapest and sports fewer features, but it offers a complete solution in itself for specific target market and expected follow up sales of other products. You can only "configure" away so much from these. There's an extremely dry (thinking about it makes me reach for lotion!) but very interesting book called the Strategy and Tactics of Pricing that delves into the topic of...well, you can guess :-) Best regards, Lynn Fredricks President Paradigma Software http://www.paradigmasoft.com Valentina SQL Server: The Ultra-fast, Royalty Free Database Server _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
