Since I never got that far, can't comment on that but I did get the idea fro a post on the web specifically about dual booting Snow Leopard and Lion so maybe it can work? Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:21 PM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > I don't think Lion likes to be installed on partitions. It wants to own the > disk. As part of the the installation process, it makes it's own, secret > partition that acts as an 'emergency disk' when you boot, hear the chime, > and hold down command and R. Pretty useful, unless one's partitions > unravel. This emergency partition has Disk Utility, Reset admin password, > Startup Disk and a Safari based help utility that's live on the net. One > can even install a fresh version of Lion on a new or old disk in that mode. > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Peter Haworth <p...@lcsql.com> wrote: > > > Hi Stephen, > > I concur that Apple are treating their user base as dumbasses these days. > > It's probably fair to say that there are a substantial number of them > that > > fit that moniker! The problem is that Apple doesn't always provide a way > > to tell them "I'm not a dumbass and I would like to not be treated as > > such". > > > > During the process of installing Lion, I too found a disk problem. In my > > case, it wasn't a failure per se but when I tried to create a second > > partition to hold Lion, DiskUtitliy flagged an error. Don't recall > exactly > > what it was but I had to boot from my Snow Leopard disk and run > DiskUtitlty > > from there to fix it. > > > > The weird thing was that even after fixing it, I still couldn't create > the > > second partition. There was plenty of room on the disk for the new > > partition but when I kicked off the process of creating it, I got an > error > > that there wasn't enough disk space to re-partition the drive. > > > > Pete > > lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:36 PM, stephen barncard < > > stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > > > > > I've found that 'export' is the key to getting around not having a > 'save > > > as...'. Not a natural workflow to me, and I have to remember which apps > > are > > > and are not part of the 'new paradigm'.Stephen Barncard > > > San Francisco Ca. USA > > more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
