An opaque button as a group object doesn't cover card layer objects. I can't leave the card--that won't work for my situation.
On May 22, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Why not an opaque button? You can have some kind of background image so it > doesn't look so hokey. Alternatively, you can just take them to another card. > > Bob > > > On May 22, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Peter Bogdanoff wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a stack with many cards. Each card contains a group and card objects. >> I want a single object (a field saying "Please wait...") to show as >> necessary and overlay everything on the card. It's hidden by scripts when no >> longer needed--the wait is over. >> >> As far as I can figure, that object needs to be a card object. Is this true? >> I'd like a simple solution! A dialog won't work (no user interaction is >> wanted). Is a palette necessary? >> >> Peter Bogdanoff >> UCLA >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
