Kind of true Geoff, but the call would have arguments in place of parameters, whereas function roundUp x,i isn't the function's definition either. Not intending to nit-pick.
Joe Wilkins Architect On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Geoff Canyon Rev wrote: > ? That is the definition (and not a call). > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepe...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Certainly better than nothing; but, if you put it in the function >> definition instead of the calls, you only have to do it one time. >> >> Joe Wilkins >> >> On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:04 PM, gcanyon+rev wrote: >> >>> I'm curious what you think of this, which is what I try to do regularly >> when I create one-liners (which I favor). >>> >>> function roundUp x,i -- rounds x up to the next i >>> >>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepe...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> If you're going to use one liners like this, you'd better add some >> commentary. >>> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
