? That is the definition (and not a call). On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepe...@cox.net> wrote:
> Certainly better than nothing; but, if you put it in the function > definition instead of the calls, you only have to do it one time. > > Joe Wilkins > > On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:04 PM, gcanyon+rev wrote: > > > I'm curious what you think of this, which is what I try to do regularly > when I create one-liners (which I favor). > > > > function roundUp x,i -- rounds x up to the next i > > > > On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepe...@cox.net> wrote: > > > >> If you're going to use one liners like this, you'd better add some > commentary. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > use-livecode mailing list > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
