It's kind of always been this way. I remember getting brand new Dells, installing all the software they need, joining domain etc. Last step was installing AV. The reason I put that last because the performance hit if I did it first would have doubled my deployment time. <sigh>
Bob S > On Jan 8, 2019, at 08:08 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bob Sneidar wrote: > > >> On Jan 7, 2019, at 17:59 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> > >> Maybe this is one more reason to move everything to the cloud, > >> to end the tyrrany of overzealously monitored local disk I/O. :) > >> > >> I honestly don't have the quick-fix answer that will keep our > >> customers happy with disk-intensive apps. > >> > >> Sugggestions? > > > > SSD? > > Alas, my tests were done on an SSD. I haven't used platters for anything but > backups in half a decade. > > In a few years we may reach a point where the speed difference between disk > and RAM will be so minor that it'll render half of the things they teach in > CS101 obsolete. > > But for now, the order-of-magnitude difference on writes introduced by > Defender's RTP will likely remain a problem until Windows brings their AV > monitoring methods in line with more advanced packages. > > -- > Richard Gaskin _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
