Thanks for the clarification Jaque. So, I already had the current LiveCode server before I 'invested' in the revServer myth. Live and learn! ;-)
On 18 Feb 2011, at 19:19, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 2/18/11 9:30 AM, Keith Clarke wrote: >> Thanks for reframing the problem Bjoernke! >> >> Actually, I have the 3.5 CGI but as I arrived on planet LiveCode >> after version 4, I'm concerned about just how limited my palette >> would be with v3.5 engine and UI controls. This is especially the >> case as I've used several plug-ins and externals in my concept >> demonstrators and as I'm sure these won't roll-back elegantly, I lack >> the environment or capability to undertake rigorous unit and >> integration test of all of those against 3.5, to establish my hard >> limits for the product re-engineering toolset. > > If you use LiveCode as a CGI you will see no significant differences between > 3.5 and 4.x, because a CGI is faceless -- no GUI, no window display. The > capabilities added to 4.0 are mostly graphical features which CGIs do not > support anyway. There is no screen display for a CGI. > > Think of a CGI as you do the message box. Text only, in and out. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
