Robert, Sorry, I had moved focus from considering the user experience of the developed application to the development environment and how to shove 4.5.3 prototypes into a limited 3.5 environment. As this thread is far from its origin, I'm starting a new thread, with more appropriate question. On 18 Feb 2011, at 15:43, Robert Brenstein wrote:
> On 18.02.11 at 15:30 +0000 Keith Clarke apparently wrote: >> Thanks for reframing the problem Bjoernke! >> >> Actually, I have the 3.5 CGI but as I arrived on planet LiveCode after >> version 4, I'm concerned about just how limited my palette would be with >> v3.5 engine and UI controls. This is especially the case as I've used >> several plug-ins and externals in my concept demonstrators and as I'm sure >> these won't roll-back elegantly, I lack the environment or capability to >> undertake rigorous unit and integration test of all of those against 3.5, to >> establish my hard limits for the product re-engineering toolset. >> > > I am afraid, you are confusing something. Your palette and options would be > pretty much the same. When using RevCGI (or RevServer for that matter), the > entire GUI that your users see is the one produced within the web browser > page. Nothing native to LiveCode. What you seem to be talking about would > require using Revlets (but that requires the plugin to be installed on user > end) or a desktop app (even thin app requires installation of a program on > the client computer). > > Something simply does not add up in what you say ;-) > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode