That's true - it would be easier to run into bugs if we did make it an option.
On May 24, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Ian Santopietro <isan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rather than making the transparency an option, we should focus efforts into > improving the transparency performance such that it has a negligible effect > on performance. That makes Unity faster and better looking for everyone, and > reduces code complexity and bug chance. > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Ryan Gauger <rtg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I just had an idea that may speed up Unity even further. We could perhaps > make transparency behind the launcher an option, so that if users choose to > disable it, their computer's performance and speed should run a bit smoother. > Just an idea :) Thanks! > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > -- > Ian Santopietro > > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. > See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > > "Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast > Ofer middangeard monnum sended" > > Pa gur yv y porthaur? > > Public GPG key (RSA): > http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x412F52DB1BBF1234 >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
