> I'll argue that the 60 sec timeout popups are better than the current two in > one situation . If there's two entries Restart and Shut down , and each has > its own timer it's possible to click on whatever you like to do and forget > about it , whereas now you're obligated to make two clicks . Not to mention > that it's way more intuitive to have restart as a separate entry and not put > it as an unimportant addition . People do restarts after all.
If you're just going to forget about it, aren't you usually going to be leaving the computer? A shutdown would be more apt in this case anyway. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:05, Petko <pditc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/27/2012 04:51 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> >> On 27 February 2012 08:06, Nekhelesh Ramananthan<krnekhel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Reading through the replies from Mark Shuttleworth, Paul, Omar B., I >>> propose >>> the following solution. >>> >>> 1. Integrate Startup Applications into the gnome control center (removal >>> from power cog menu) >>> 2. Add an option to restart in the power cog menu. >>> 3. The shutdown dialog should have a 60 second timeout which still brings >>> about the "undo" functionality but also removes the need to confirm it >>> again >>> by just letting it countdown to zero. >>> 4. Option to enable or disable login sound be presented in the sound >>> settings dialog or under user accounts (so that each user can choose to >>> disable or enable it) >> >> Would someone like to go ahead and open a bug against >> gnome-control-center for #4, and for #1 against gnome-session to >> request that it show in System Settings? I already opened >> http://pad.lv/941697 for #3. >> >> Since as already been stated, adding a restart option to the system >> menu would require an "are you sure"-style popup which is already >> provided by the existing shut down dialog, I don't think that's >> necessarily a useful improvement or has consensus. >> >> Jeremy Bicha >> > I'll argue that the 60 sec timeout popups are better than the current two in > one situation . If there's two entries Restart and Shut down , and each has > its own timer it's possible to click on whatever you like to do and forget > about it , whereas now you're obligated to make two clicks . Not to mention > that it's way more intuitive to have restart as a separate entry and not put > it as an unimportant addition . People do restarts after all. > > Petko > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Ian Santopietro Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html "Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast Ofer middangeard monnum sended" Pa gur yv y porthaur? Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x412F52DB1BBF1234 -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
