unicode  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? philip chastney via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
• PDF restrictions on the Unicode Standard 10.0 Henri Sivonen via Unicode
• Emoji’s jillian mestel via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji’s Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji’s Christoph Päper via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji’s Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
• Whitespace-related characters Karl Sanders via Unicode
• Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode
  • Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode
• W3C discussion: nullifying BCP47 tags for emoji presentation in HTML/XML J. S. Choi via Unicode
• Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
• Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode
• Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Asmus Freytag via Unicode
  • Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
• Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
  • Re: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • RE: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
  • Re: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Philippe Verdy via Unicode
• Linearized tilde? David Starner via Unicode
  • Re: Linearized tilde? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Linearized tilde? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: Linearized tilde? Doug Ewell via Unicode
  • Re: Linearized tilde? Michael Everson via Unicode
• Traditional and Simplified Han in UTS 39 Karl Williamson via Unicode
  • Re: Traditional and Simplified Han in UTS 39 Phake Nick via Unicode
  • Re: Traditional and Simplified Han in UTS 39 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Traditional and Simplified Han in UTS 39 Asmus Freytag via Unicode
• Inconsistency between UTS 39 and 24 Karl Williamson via Unicode
  • Re: Inconsistency between UTS 39 and 24 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
• Possible bug in formal grammar for extended grapheme cluster David P. Kendal via Unicode
  • Re: Possible bug in formal grammar for extended grapheme cluster Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Possible bug in formal grammar for extended grapheme cluster Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: Possible bug in formal grammar for extended grapheme cluster Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
• Include emoticons in CLDR character annotation? Christoph Päper via Unicode
• Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Michael Everson via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Michael Everson via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • RE: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Andrew Glass via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Serge Rosmorduc via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Word_Break for Hieroglyphs Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
• Atomicity of Grapheme Clusters Richard Wordingham via Unicode
• Aquaφοβία Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Aquaφοβία Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Aquaφοβία Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • RE: Aquaφοβία Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
  • Re: Aquaφοβία Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode
  • RE: Aquaφοβία Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
  • Re: Aquaφοβία Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
• Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
• Typo in FAQ-Indic ? Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode
• Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Asmus Freytag via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: Armenian Mijaket (Armenian colon) Asmus Freytag via Unicode
• Minimal Implementation of Unicode Collation Algorithm Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Minimal Implementation of Unicode Collation Algorithm Markus Scherer via Unicode
  • Re: Minimal Implementation of Unicode Collation Algorithm Richard Wordingham via Unicode
• \b and Indic word boundaries? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
• International Digital Preservation Day William_J_G Overington via Unicode
• FW: Plane-2-only string i18nguy supplementary-test page Tex via Unicode
• Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string James Kass via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Phake Nick via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Bobby Tung via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string Charlie Ruland via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
  • Re: Plane-2-only string John H. Jenkins via Unicode
  • RE: Plane-2-only string Peter Constable via Unicode
• ASCII v Unicode Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Asmus Freytag via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Phake Nick via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Sudhanwa Jogalekar via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: ASCII v Unicode Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
• Emoji candidate chart update Rick McGowan via Unicode
• A criteria for Emoji property assignment? Rostislav via Unicode
  • Re: A criteria for Emoji property assignment? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
• Emoji anomaly Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji anomaly Peter Edberg via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji anomaly Andre Schappo via Unicode
  • Re: Emoji anomaly Peter Edberg via Unicode
• Normalise Tai Tham or not? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not? Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
  • Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not? Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
  • Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
  • Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not? Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
• Interesting UTF-8 decoder Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
  • Re: Interesting UTF-8 decoder J Decker via Unicode
  • Re: Interesting UTF-8 decoder Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
• Question about Karabakh Characters via Unicode
  • Re: Question about Karabakh Characters Michael Everson via Unicode
  • RE: Question about Karabakh Characters via Unicode
  • Re: Question about Karabakh Characters Michael Everson via Unicode
• Re: HTTPS Mathias Bynens via Unicode
  • Re: HTTPS Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: HTTPS Asmus Freytag via Unicode
  • Re: HTTPS Steven R. Loomis via Unicode
  • Re: HTTPS Philippe Verdy via Unicode
• implicit weight base for U+2CEA2 James Tauber via Unicode
  • Re: implicit weight base for U+2CEA2 Markus Scherer via Unicode
  • Re: implicit weight base for U+2CEA2 Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: implicit weight base for U+2CEA2 James Tauber via Unicode
  • Re: implicit weight base for U+2CEA2 Markus Scherer via Unicode
• IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Leo Broukhis via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Magnus Bodin ☀ via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Leo Broukhis via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Leo Broukhis via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Philippe Verdy via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Leo Broukhis via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Asmus Freytag via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Shirriff via Unicode
  • Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode

• Earlier messages
• Later messages