On 9/27/2017 9:32 AM, Ken Whistler via
Unicode wrote:
The only font on that machine can be found by feeling the key strikers in the typewriter. In that context it's worth remembering that there while you could say for most typewriters that "the typewriter is the font", there were noted exceptions. The IBM Selectric, for example, had exchangeable type balls which allowed both a font and / or encoding change. (Encoding understood here as association of character to key). That technology was then only two years in
the future. Other typewriters used interchangeable type wheels for the same purpose, but I believe that generally came later. A./ |
- IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Leo Broukhis via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Magnus Bodin ☀ via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbo... Leo Broukhis via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbo... Leo Broukhis via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character s... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character s... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid charact... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid charact... Leo Broukhis via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid ch... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invali... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 in... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 in... Ken Shirriff via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 in... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 in... John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 in... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol Karl Pentzlin via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbo... Leo Broukhis via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbol John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character symbo... Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
- Re: IBM 1620 invalid character s... Philippe Verdy via Unicode