On Fri, 26 May 2017 11:22:37 -0700 Ken Whistler via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> On 5/26/2017 10:28 AM, Karl Williamson via Unicode wrote: > > The link provided about the PRI doesn't lead to the comments. > > > > PRI #121 (August, 2008) pre-dated the practice of keeping all the > feedback comments together with the PRI itself in a numbered > directory with the name "feedback.html". But the comments were > collected together at the time and are accessible here: > > http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2008/08282-pubrev.html#pri121 > > Also there was a separately submitted comment document: > > http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2008/08280-pri121-cmt.txt > > And the minutes of the pertinent UTC meeting (UTC #116): > > http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2008/08253.htm > > The minutes simply capture the consensus to adopt Option #2 from PRI > #121, and the relevant action items. For Unicode members, there is also the original Unicore thread, which starts at http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicore-ml/y2008-m04/0091.html . (I couldn't find anything on the general list.) There were objections there to replacing non-shortest form sequences by multiple ocurrences of U+FFFD. They were rejected by those that mattered, and so the option of a single U+FFFD was not included in the PRI. Richard.
