> On 17 May 2017, at 23:18, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > > Hans Åberg wrote: > >>> Far from solving the stated problem, it would introduce a new one: >>> conversion from the "bad data" Unicode code points, currently >>> well-defined, would become ambiguous. >> >> Actually not: just translate the invalid UTF-8 sequences into invalid >> UTF-32. > > Far from solving the stated problem, it would introduce TWO new ones...
There is no good solution to the problem of illegal UTF-8 sequences, as the intent of those is not known.
