On 02/04/2014, Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/2/2014 1:42 AM, Christopher Fynn wrote: >> Rather than Emoji it might be better if people learnt Han ideographs >> which are also compact (and a far more developed system of >> communication than emoji). One CJK character can also easily replace >> dozens of Latin characters - which is what is being claimed for emoji. > > One wonders why the Japanese, who already know Han ideographs, took to > emoji as they did....
Perhaps because emoji are a sort of playful version of a means of communication they are already used to _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
